ARTICLES & NEWS

PJ v HB [2023] EWHC 3400: Success in the High Court

Published by Zubhair Mughal

Published on: February 15, 2024
Lasted Updated: February 15, 2024

Last month, Zubair appeared before the Hon. Sir Jonathan Cohen in the High Court in an appeal from the family court.

The appeal concerned the reduction of contact, and whether the final hearing judge was justified in reducing contact on the basis that Zubair’s client had rejected the findings of fact from a fact-finding hearing.

At paragraph 19, the High Court found:
A non-acceptance of a finding does not necessarily lead to a situation where the frequency of contact should be adjusted. It does not seem to me, in this case, that there is any benefit offered to M by the reduction which the judge imposed.

The full judgment can be found here: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2023/3400.html

Zubair is a barrister specialising in family law. He is qualified to accept instructions under the public access scheme, also known as direct access.

More Articles

How are overseas assets treated in financial remedy proceedings?

Where parties have separated and obtained a divorce in an overseas jurisdiction, they cannot simply apply for financial relief in the English and Welsh jurisdiction.

Should You Represent Yourself in Family Court Proceedings?

Navigating family court proceedings can be a daunting and complex process, particularly when emotions are running high and important decisions need to be made.

Crafting an Effective Position Statement for Family Court Proceedings

In family court proceedings, a position statement serves as a crucial document that articulates your stance, concerns, and desired outcomes regarding the issues at hand.

ARTICLES & NEWS

PJ v HB [2023] EWHC 3400: Success in the High Court

Published by Zubhair Mughal

Published on: February 15, 2024
Lasted Updated: February 15, 2024

Last month, Zubair appeared before the Hon. Sir Jonathan Cohen in the High Court in an appeal from the family court.

The appeal concerned the reduction of contact, and whether the final hearing judge was justified in reducing contact on the basis that Zubair’s client had rejected the findings of fact from a fact-finding hearing.

At paragraph 19, the High Court found:
A non-acceptance of a finding does not necessarily lead to a situation where the frequency of contact should be adjusted. It does not seem to me, in this case, that there is any benefit offered to M by the reduction which the judge imposed.

The full judgment can be found here: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2023/3400.html

Zubair is a barrister specialising in family law. He is qualified to accept instructions under the public access scheme, also known as direct access.

More Articles

How are overseas assets treated in financial remedy proceedings?

Where parties have separated and obtained a divorce in an overseas jurisdiction, they cannot simply apply for financial relief in the English and Welsh jurisdiction.

Should You Represent Yourself in Family Court Proceedings?

Navigating family court proceedings can be a daunting and complex process, particularly when emotions are running high and important decisions need to be made.

Crafting an Effective Position Statement for Family Court Proceedings

In family court proceedings, a position statement serves as a crucial document that articulates your stance, concerns, and desired outcomes regarding the issues at hand.